The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment showed the attitude of the Defendant, instead of the investigative agency, the court below, and the court of the trial, that the Defendant committed the crime of this case in favor of the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant seems to have committed a contingent crime under the influence of alcohol. However, the Defendant did not recover from the damage up to the trial. In full view of the fact that there was the history of punishment for the same kind of crime, and all other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, occupation, occupation, power, process of the instant crime, means and consequence, circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but it is obvious that "1. C's accusation is omitted in the summary column of the evidence of the judgment below. Thus, the defendant's appeal is added in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure. It is so decided as per Disposition.