The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment).

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendant’s attitude that the Defendant, in lieu of the investigation agency, the lower court, and the trial court, had shown that he had taken into account his criminal conduct and misunderstandings, the Defendant did not recover damages up to the trial. In particular, the Defendant had been subject to punishment several times as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. In particular, the instant crime was committed again without being aware of the period of repeated offense after being discharged from prison, and then discharged therefrom, the lower court’s sentencing appears to have taken into account all favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may differ from the lower court and the sentence, and taking into account all the circumstances indicated in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, power, process of the instant crime, means and consequence, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.