1. The instant lawsuit was completed on June 27, 2015 by a final and conclusive decision in lieu of conciliation.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

The court failed to reach an agreement on June 8, 2015 at the open date for conciliation, and the court made a decision in lieu of conciliation on the same day (hereinafter “instant decision”) and reached each of the attorneys of the plaintiff and the defendant on June 12, 2015. The fact that the instant decision became final and conclusive as it was because the plaintiff and the defendant did not raise an objection to the said decision by June 26, 2015, which is the closing date of the period for raising an objection.

The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff submitted to the competent court a statement of intent of objection against the decision in lieu of conciliation on June 17, 2015, stating that it was submitted to the said court on the same day. However, the content stated in the above preparatory document is that “If the Defendant does not consent to the subscription of the lease contract newly presented by the Plaintiff by June 24, 2015, he/she would raise an objection in lieu of conciliation,” which is merely a planned procedural act of filing an objection against the instant decision under a certain condition in the future.

Therefore, the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have raised an objection to the decision of this case on the same day, and the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have raised an objection to the decision of this case without any other litigation after the lapse of June 24, 2015, which was the date the plaintiff presented in the above preparatory document.

If so, the instant lawsuit was concluded on June 27, 2015 as a final and conclusive decision in lieu of conciliation.

It is so decided as per Disposition.