logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.03 2014가합7199
추심금
Text

1. Each of the instant lawsuits becomes final and conclusive on March 26, 2015 by the court in lieu of conciliation on March 6, 2015.

Reasons

Recognizing the facts, this Court rendered a ruling to refer the above two cases to conciliation on February 25, 2015, before the consolidation of the collection amount of 2014 A. 7199 and 2014 A. 17776 cases for debt extension. On March 6, 2015, the conciliation date was the conciliation date. The original ruling substituted for conciliation was delivered to the defendant's legal representative on March 10, 2015, respectively to the plaintiff on March 11, 2015, and the defendant's legal representative filed an objection against the ruling substituted for conciliation on March 11, 2015; the defendant's legal representative filed an objection against the above conciliation on March 11, 2015; the plaintiff's legal representative submitted an objection to the above ruling to the court on August 12, 2015 to the defendant's legal representative on March 20, 2015, and the plaintiff's legal representative on the date of pleading and the defendant's legal representative on March 15, 2015.

A party who has filed an objection against a decision substituting for conciliation of the market may withdraw an objection with the consent of the other party until a judgment at the corresponding instance is rendered. Where an oral objection is withdrawn on the date of pleading present at the meeting, the other party shall be deemed to have consented to withdrawal of the objection unless the other party raises an objection within two weeks from the date of withdrawal of the objection (see Article 34(3) of the Judicial Conciliation of Civil Disputes Act and Article 266(3) and (6) of the Civil Procedure Act). Meanwhile, when a decision in lieu of

arrow