logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.03.28 2019고합7
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of four and a half years, and imprisonment for a period of four years, respectively.

No. 1. Evidence seized by the Defendants

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not infringe on the defendants' right of defense, part of the facts charged confirmed or not confirmed by the record was revised.

Although all the Defendants were not a person handling narcotics, they dealt with psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related clocks (i.e., one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) as follows, although they were not a person handling narcotics, etc. under the nationality of Thailand:

[Madern's mother of criminal conduct] On November 2018, 2018, the Defendants purchased a penphone in the Thailand and carried it into the Republic of Korea through Defendant B (F)'s friendly and unfolded names (G), and then sold it to the Thailand in the Republic of Korea and gathered to divide the profits therefrom in the house of the E employee of the Co., Ltd. working for Defendant A (F).

[Implementation of Criminal Execution] On December 12, 2018, the Defendants ordered the Defendant to use a philopon using a philopon H video call in the early 2018 police officer. The Defendants: (a) placed approximately 96.91g of philopon into a plastic bag in Thailand; (b) concealed approximately 96.91g of philopon into a plastic bag; (c) placed it into a large plastic bag; and (d) sent it to an aviation-specific mail (registration number: I); (b) around 07:09 on December 12, 2018, the said aviation-specific item arrived at the Incheon International Government Provision in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Port.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to import philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on detection of illegal goods, a photograph of detection of illegal goods, and a reply to the results of analysis;

1. A output of the relevant conversation stored in a mobile phone owned by Defendant A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime: Articles 58 (1) 6, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Narcotics Control Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: each of them.

arrow