logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.26 2013고합204
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(장물)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for one year and six months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to purchase high-priced smartphones stolen or acquired by others at low prices, and sell them to the cell phone buyers to gain profits from them, and Defendant B intended to advertise through the Internet to the effect that “to purchase the cellphones, learning, and cellphones with the highest price for the cellphones”, and Defendant A conspired to take charge of the role of purchasing cell phones from cell phone sellers who reported and contact the above bulletin and disposing of it through S.

Defendant

B A. From January 28, 2013, from around 15:00 on the 28th day of Ansan-si TPC, I continued to publish a letter to the effect that “U” website and telephone numbers accessible to other people’s tables and “Emphones, barphones,” and Defendant A purchased at KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

In addition, from January 28, 2013 to February 15, 2013, the Defendants habitually purchased at least KRW 20,000 to KRW 380,00,00 from the person who has not been able to purchase the cell phone total of 73 mobile phones, which are stolen in the same way as the list of crimes in the attached Form, in the same manner as the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolen goods habitually.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Defendants’ written statements

1. A written statement prepared by each victim of V and W;

1. A criminal investigation report (an abstract of contents of conversations on cell phone text messages used by a suspect X);

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed systematically and systematically;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow