logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2011.05.26 2010고단2218
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2002, the criminal defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment and three months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on October 25, 2002, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison on January 19, 2003.

The actual facts

1. On March 17, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months on August 27, 2004 by this court as a joint venture with other cases.

9.4. In collusion with the final and conclusive judgment of the court, the victim D in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do around 15:00 on March 12, 2003 is operated by the victim D, and the facts are as follows: even if the defendant received the advance payment from the victim, even if he was aware of the above circumstances, he did not intend to work as an employee from the above multilateral bank, and even if he was well aware of these circumstances, he would introduce the female employee, while he would also introduce the victim as the victim, and the victim "on March 17, 2003, 200 won as the advance payment."

4.To work as an employee until 16.

On March 17, 2003, the Defendant was granted 6 million won as a prepaid payment from the Hanyang Saemaeul Community Depository, which was around 16:00 on March 17, 2003. On March 21, 2003, the Defendant in collusion with the Defendant on March 21, 2003, at the “H” main point operated by the victim G in Chungcheongnamnam F, and on March 21, 2003, even if the Defendant received money under the pretext of advance payment from the victim, the Defendant and the victim were well aware of these circumstances, but the Defendant and the victim had no intent to work as an employee at the above main point. However, if the Defendant and the victim were to pay 4 million won as a prepaid payment, the Defendant (A) would be an employee.

“A false statement to the effect that it is, the Defendant received 4 million won and 8 million won in total from the victim, respectively, under the pretext of prepaid, the Defendant received 4 million won and 4 million won.

3. On April 2, 2003, the Defendant conspired with B on April 2, 2003, in collusion with the Defendant, and at around 15:30 on April 2, 2003, the “KG” operated by the victim J in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the fact is an employee even if the Defendant received money from the victim as a prepaid payment.

arrow