1.(a)

D A contract of donation concluded on October 31, 201 with respect to the real estate stated in paragraph 1 of the attached list between D and Defendant B.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s damage claim 1)D and E’s tort 1) D had a patent right related to the method of installing underground tunnels, such as G, H, I, and J, as the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

K was responsible for collecting information, etc. on government-funded works that include non-rupture construction works in F as the children of D, and promoting to apply public law to design.

E was in charge of preparing and managing documents, such as a financial management, an agreement with members, and a technical support design agreement.

B) The opportunity for D, E, K, or D or F to hold a patent construction method, such as G, in connection with the non-open construction work is not a specific construction work decided by the patent construction method, but a snow company patent construction work is not guaranteed within a short period even if it is reflected in the design of a specific construction work, so even if the association cost and design cost are paid, it was not an intent or ability to receive construction from the victims, but the victims would receive the construction work as if the patented construction work were reflected in a specific construction work. C, E, and K received the construction work from the association cost or design cost under the pretext of allowing the construction work as if the patented construction work were reflected in a specific construction work. C, E, and K received the down payment from the F office located in the eightth floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan L building under the name of 1.2 billion won for the purpose of 20 billion won for the remainder of the construction work under the name of 1.8 billion won for the same time as the Association, 1.6 billion won for the remainder of the construction work.