logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2018.07.20 2017나14665
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s damage claim 1)D and E’s tort 1) D had a patent right related to the method of installing underground tunnels, such as G, H, I, and J, as the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

E was in charge of preparing and managing documents, such as a financial management, an agreement with members, and a technical support design agreement.

B) D and E agreed with D and E as an opportunity that D and E hold a patent construction method, including G, with respect to non-scheduled construction work. The fact is not a specific construction work decided by the patent construction method, but a patent construction work is not guaranteed within a short period of time even if the patent construction work is reflected in the design of a specific construction work, so even if the patent construction work is not covered by the design of the specific construction work, they did not receive association expenses or design expenses under the name of ordering the construction work as if the patent construction work were reflected in a specific construction work. C) D and E in collusion with D and E to the effect that, around October 2, 2006, N, who is the actual operator of the plaintiff, through M in the F office located at eight stories of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoul, for the purpose of 0.0 billion won and delivery of 200 billion won under the name of 0.0 billion won and 10.0 billion won for the remainder of the construction work, 10.0 billion won and 200 billion won for the Association's Association.

arrow