logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고단7396
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 3, 2017, the Defendant 18:42 around 18:42, on the road in front of the cafeteria C cafeteria B, the Defendant is not a body fighting.

“The police officer E, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on 112 of the content, committed assault by the police officer E, who was in charge of the police station D district forces of the Sungdong Police Station, to listen to the statement about the circumstances of the instant case while stopping the Defendant, to walk the parts of the Hebbbbbbbbbs once, to walk the E’s plbbbbbbbbs once, with his hand, and to display the E’s buck

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to 112 Incident reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the public authority for the enforcement of the law was damaged due to the instant crime.

However, in this case, the degree of tangible power exercised by the defendant is not significant.

The defendant recognizes his wrong and reflects his wrong.

There is no record of punishment except for minor fines imposed on the defendant due to a violation of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces in 199.

The Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime by selingly, selingly, the arms that had been prevented by the police at the time, and resulting in any contingent crime.

In addition, the defendant's age, sex, motive and background of the crime, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, records of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the records, shall be determined by the same sentence as the order.

arrow