logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.04.13 2016나5090
부동산 중개수수료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows, except for the modification of the relevant part of evidence submitted by this court or the addition of the additional decision, and therefore, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The part of the first instance court's decision is revised to "it is not sufficient to acknowledge it only with the statements of Gap evidence 1 through 3, and 10, or testimony of witness D," in Part 3, Paragraph 11, "It is not sufficient to acknowledge it only with the testimony of Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 10, and evidence of Gap evidence 10 through 13, witness D, and witness of the second instance court, and the result of this court's CD verification," and the defendant's testimony of Gap evidence 1 through 13, witness evidence of the first instance court, and witness D's testimony of this case to conclude a lease contract of this case with the defendant of this case without any further agreement of this case. It is difficult to accept the plaintiff's first instance court's conclusion that the defendant's testimony of this case was about the lease contract of this case with the defendant of this case and the witness D's testimony of this case without any further agreement of this case."

arrow