1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation on this case is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to invalidate the letter of this case only with the testimony of Gap 3 and 4, witness D and witness E of the court of first instance as to "no grounds" from No. 3 and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 8 of the same case from July 4, 2013, which the defendant interfered with the passage of D between July 4, 2013, which the defendant agreed to interfere with the partition of co-owned property by July 4, 2013, or D cannot respond to the partition of co-owned property by July 4, 2013 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently from the above judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.