logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고단7103
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 24, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties of the performance of official duties, on the street of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant: (a) sent a fighting boat to the 112 report that “the fighting has occurred; (b) the police officer of the E-district of the Kimpo Police Station; and (c) the police officer of the Hapo-si, who sent the vehicle to the vehicle, arrested the said D as a flagrant offender causing property damage; and (d) tried to send a new soldier to the district while drunk while drunking, attempted to put the front door of the patrol and interfere with the operation of the patrol, and interfered with the operation of the patrol; (b) received a restraint from the above Gyeong (29 years of age and south); and (c) carried out an assault with the said G, such as assault and smuggling.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officer G and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the scene of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) was brought in to the E district of the Kimpo Police Station; (c) under the influence of alcohol the police officers working in the said district in the said district; (d) took a bath for the police officers to have “this chrone, franchise, franch, franch, and franched only later; and (c) avoided a disturbance, such as avoiding franchis and smoking in the district; and (d) was franchising a disturbance for about 30 minutes by a police officer who was working in the E district, who was informed of his franchise and franchising the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. On-site photographs, damaged vehicles, damaged photographs, etc., internal investigation reports (in relation to the situation at the time of their withdrawal), reports on the string, statement on the string, statement on the string, report on internal investigation (in relation to strings), list of reported cases of 112;

arrow