logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.03.27 2013고단1663
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a fwing cargo vehicle B.

1. On September 16, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) (hereinafter “Dangerous Punishment, etc.”) driven the above cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.204% in blood, and proceeded directly with approximately 50 km per hour in the fluoral frith of 100 meters in the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, in the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor of cluor, if

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the left side and the steering system of the motor vehicle, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the defendant is under the influence of alcohol and is in progress with neglect.

The telegraph owner, who escaped from the road on the right side of the road, was shocked by the front part of the freight vehicle on the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C(the age of 53) who was on the top of the cargo tank of the Defendant’s driver’s drive while normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, such as an injury to the victim C, who was on the duty of care for about eight weeks.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 800 meters at a section of about 100 meters, from the Do in Cluri-ri to the front road of about 100 meters in front of the 100-meter radius from the Do in Cluri-ri, if both the Defendant and the Defendant were to be able to drive the vehicle in the state of alcohol level of about 0.204%.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the foregoing cargo vehicle that had not been covered by mandatory insurance from February 22, 2009 to the date and time stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow