1. As to KRW 8,552,824 and KRW 936,221 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 7,616,603 from July 10, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”)

B) On April 28, 199, between the Construction Mutual Aid Association and the Construction Mutual Aid Association, a guarantee obligation agreement for the limit on transaction of defects liability, etc. (hereinafter “the guarantee obligation agreement for the limit transaction of this case”).

(B) The rehabilitation company, Ulsan Construction Co., Ltd. (the trade name before the change is referred to as “oil source construction company”).

hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff Company"

(2) The Defendant and the New Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “New Construction”)

D) The joint and several sureties’s debt to D Construction Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “instant joint and several sureties Agreement”).

(2) On June 28, 1999, the Construction Mutual Aid Association issued a warranty bond for the new construction of the E Apartment Complex (BB block) with the guarantee creditor as the E apartmentB complex council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "council of occupants' representatives of this case").

B. On June 14, 2013, the council of occupants’ representatives of the construction mutual aid association filed a claim with the construction mutual aid association for the performance of repair of defects and the deposit for ten years, and the construction mutual aid association paid KRW 157,140,000 for the cost of repairing defects to the council of occupants’ representatives, which is the guarantee creditor, due to the performance of the guarantee liability following the issuance of the above guarantee certificate on November 27, 2013.

C. The declaration of bankruptcy of the new construction was made on August 21, 200, and was declared bankrupt at the Seoul District Court on November 17, 2000.

1) On January 9, 2014, the Construction Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “Construction Mutual Aid Association”) acquired investment certificates from the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Construction Mutual

(2) On the same day, the Construction Mutual Aid Association appropriated the Plaintiff Company as part of its original claim for indemnity. (3) On the same day, the balance of the claim for indemnity of this case is KRW 91,39,236.