beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From the end of December 2018, the Defendant made a phone call to the victim B who became aware of the fact through the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) around early December 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay KRW 30 million at the expense of taking over at the time he/she would want to operate the English camp in the Philippines. 10 million won was drawing after his/her mother was prepared, and the Defendant would pay the principal and interest of the loan with the proceeds of the four-day shop if he/she received the remainder of KRW 20 million from the mother.”
However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not think that he would run a four-day shop in the Philippines. At that time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the victim with a debt equivalent to KRW 4,0310,000,000 in total, including KRW 2,302,000,000, without any special asset.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 6 million in total from the victim, via the E bank account (F) in the name of D on December 27, 2018, and KRW 14 million in total from the E bank account in the name of G on December 28, 2018.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On April 2019, the Defendant was askeding the Victim B to pay interest and principal on the transaction money under the above paragraph (1) from the Defendant, and on December 28, 2018, the Defendant was willing to defraud money and valuables by deceiving the Defendant’s husband with a single sex relationship with the victim on a one-time basis.
At the end of March 2019, the Defendant pretended to be the husband of the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not contact with the husband of the Defendant, and there was a false statement as to why the Defendant, “Ap is an elementary school,” and “App is the same as that of an elementary school,” and why the Defendant borrowed 20,000 won when he met with PPP, and the interest was paid off, and why there was a false statement.