Imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in Articles 3, 5 and 7 of the judgment of the defendant, and for the remaining crimes, eight months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October, 201, for fraud in Busan District Court's Dong Branch, and finally decided April 7, 201.

"200 Highest 444"

1. On November 6, 201, at the main point of “D” located in Busan Shipping Daegu C, the Defendant: (a) lent money to the victim B to the victim B for a promise to pay money in trust that there is an operating share of the shares invested; (b) the Defendant recommended to make an investment, but the victim does not have to make any dangerous investment that is not guaranteed by the principal; (c) there is a vehicle in the name of the roadway; and (d) there is a vehicle in the name of the roadway; and (d) the Defendant paid the principal within two to three months with interest attached thereto.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property under the name of the Defendant, and had an individual liability of KRW 340,000,000 at the time, and was thought to use most of the borrowed money from the victim to pay personal debts, so there was no intention or ability to pay the money to the victim even if he borrowed money.

around November 9, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim to the E-bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 9, 2011, the Defendant, at the seat of the H Bank branch located in Busan Shipping Daegu G, borrowed money from the victim B to the customer who operated the casino in the Philippines, at a point where the H Bank was located in Busan Shipping Daegu G, the Defendant could receive a large amount of interest, and the Defendant made a false statement to pay the principal with interest.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property under the name of the Defendant, and had an individual liability of KRW 340 million at the time, and thought that most of the money borrowed from the victim would be used to repay personal debt, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the money to the victim even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, from the victim’s E Bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, KRW 8 million around November 15, 201, and KRW 4 million around the 17th day of the same month.