A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2016, around 00:56, the Defendant was investigated by the Defendant into a domestic violence case with F in a de facto marriage-related person F, and the Defendant was able to file a complaint with the head of the Seo-gu Police Station G police officer belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station G of the Jeju Police Station at around 00:56 on April 10, 2016, and the Defendant was able to file a complaint with the Defendant at once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. CCTV CD images [the above evidence and the following circumstances recognized by the police officer in question: ① the damaged police officer, despite having been in prison uniformed, was engaged in the duties inside the global belt; ② the police officer in charge of performing domestic violence, as well as the person who was in charge of the case of the defendant by domestic violence; ② the police officer in charge of domestic violence, as well as the person who was in charge of the case of the defendant; and ③ the defendant was aware that the damaged police officer was the civil petitioner; and ③ the defendant was aware that he was the civil petitioner.

First of all, the general public, who is not a police officer, entered the inside and outside of the direction room, or going further to do so, is in a situation that is almost rare in light of the empirical rule, and ④ the Defendant used violence while making the words “in the event of arrest,” and the phrase “in the event of arrest, arrest” was viewed as such, and thus, against the general public, other than a police officer.

The Defendant’s statement that it is difficult to see, (5) the structure of the said global office, and the number of people in the office at the time when the said global office was located, to the effect that there were several other civil petitioners who had been placed in a broad space outside the global office.