logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.02.11 2014고정570
의료법위반
Text

The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence of this case is publicly notified.

Reasons

The defendant in the factory room is a doctor to operate the E Council member in the original city D.

A medical person shall prepare a medical examination and treatment record in detail the matters and opinions concerning the medical practice prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, such as the main symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Nevertheless, around October 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around October 2013, via the rash beam beamline on the face of the patient F who was in the above sexual surgery; (b) conducted the so-called “flaccing procedure to increase the carbon of the skin; and (c) conducted the so-called “flacing procedure” by using the racer beam beam beamline on the face of the patient who was in the above sexual surgery; (d) on October 10, 2013, the above F used the racing line to conduct the surgery; (e) on October 17, 2013 and on October 23, 2013, the Defendant complained of side effects; and (e) on the part of the above Council member’s name, the Defendant did not have the manager of the skin manager under the name of the above Council, who did not have the above Council member attached the lacium using the enz; (e) did not have any issues, such as lacing and the lacul’sium.

Maz.

1. The key issue in this case is the defendant's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel are not "medical act" or "medical act", and since the Medical Service Act does not have any provision on the time limit for preparation of medical records, the defendant is innocent unless the defendant stated the key issue in the medical records for about 14 days

2. According to the fact-finding conducted by the Police and the Ministry of Health and Welfare, G public health officials G stated to the effect that all the issues of the instant case constituted “medical act,” while according to the fact-finding conducted by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the public officials in charge of the Ministry of Health and Welfare among the issues of the instant case are current only “the ionion of ion and filial duty supplying to the skin.”

arrow