logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.01.29 2014고단758
제3자뇌물수수
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

From September 18, 2004 to September 19, 2010, Defendant A, as the president, was in charge of the duties of the Medical Center at the Chungcheongnam-do Medical Center (hereinafter “Medical Center”) located in G and was in charge of the duties of the Medical Center. Defendant B, as the head of the Medical Center management team until December 31, 2007, and from January 1, 2008 to the date of management department, respectively, was in charge of the duties of the Medical Center, general affairs, management, etc. under the direction of Defendant A, and Defendant C is in charge of the duties of the Medical Center, general affairs, and management, and Defendant C is in charge of the transportation business operating the vehicle of the head of the vehicle with the trade name of “J” from I, and K is in charge of the Medical Center management department by December 31, 2007.

Defendant

A and B are in a position to determine the head of a funeral vehicle against residents who use the funeral hall of the medical center and to decide the detailed details of the contract.

1. The third party acceptance of bribe (Defendant A and B) made efforts for the reappointment of the president of the medical center (re-election) around September 2007, while Defendant A was working for the reappointment of the director of the medical center through K and success in the composition and reappointment (re-election) of the members of the medical center recommendation committee for Defendant A with friendly personnel for Defendant A through K, thereby extending the retirement age to K who is expected to retire at the time of retirement due to the indication of the height of the medical center for K, or promising to give the right to deliver the flowers of the funeral hall of the medical center or the medical center for the operation of the medical center.

Accordingly, Defendant A instructed Defendant B, on January 1, 2008, to “K to find out another method capable of indicating the learning,” and Defendant B, at the time, demanded C, the business owner of the funeral vehicle at the time, to provide KRW 1,500,000 per month with the notice of the number of K’s Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number L) and demand C to provide one hundred and fifty thousand won per month. In the future, C accepted Defendant B’s demand along with an unlawful solicitation to request C to allow the continuous operation of the funeral vehicle at the funeral hall of the Medical Center.

Accordingly, C is therefore from January 31, 2008 to March 24, 2009.

arrow