logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.12 2016고합134
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

310,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2008, the Defendant was introduced I upon the request of the president of the G Religious Group H, the school foundation affiliated with the G Religious Organization (hereinafter “H”) H (hereinafter “H”) that was preparing to establish F High Schools in Busan, by using the connection of the public official of the Defendant, from the Geron E, who was a public official of the Defendant.

1. On March 2009, the Defendant may receive relevant referrals, such as solicitations for change of deliberation members of the Urban Management Planning Deliberation Committee, etc., from the members of the Busan metropolitan area, and from the members of the Busan metropolitan area in order to establish the F High School, there is a person who has a negative public opinion among the deliberation members in relation to the deliberation committee of the urban management planning or the deliberation committee of the development-restricted area management plan conducted by the Busan metropolitan area and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

The relevant public official stated that it is necessary to replace the deliberation committee member as a friendly person to H, and explained as if he/she made a solicitation to the deliberation committee members of the above deliberation committee corresponding to the public official, and received money and valuables from the G religious organization office located in the department of Busan in Busan in relation to the arrangement of matters belonging to public officials by receiving KRW 250,000,000 from I on March 209, 2009, KRW 70,000,000 around June 7, 2009, KRW 60,000,000 around June 7, 2009, KRW 50,000,000 from August 20, 2009, and KRW 250,000,000 from the public official's duties.

2. On February 2, 2010, the Defendant, without omitting environmental impact assessment, received requests, etc. to obtain approval for an alteration of an urban management plan, is an environmental impact assessment procedure by us, even though our school passed a deliberation on an urban management plan with the content of receiving a decision on school site facilities within the development restriction zone.

arrow