logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2018.10.18 2018나50973
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same judgment as that of the court of first instance, and the Defendants, other than adding the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, are the same as the part against the Defendants among the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the following three.

2. The part "Defendant D" is written in a lump sum with "Co-Defendant D of the first instance trial".

Three sides, "New Construction Works" shall be implemented with "New Construction Works" as "Construction Works of a steel structure en bloc among New Construction Works".

From the last 3 pages up to 4 pages, the following shall apply:

In addition, even if the factory of this case was to be negligent in constructing a wab manufactured with the oil plate (S400 material, 2.3m thickness) from the main steel board (S400 material, 2.3m thickness), structural calculation is made on the basis of a flat board (SM490 material, 8m thickness), the material, form and thickness of which are different, and the result and basic material are provided to the defendant C of a professional structural engineer, and the 5th 4th 5th m or 5th m as follows.

2) Although the Defendants appealed, on December 14, 2017, the appellate court dismissed all appeals (Ulsan District Court 2017No479), and on October 4, 2018, the Supreme Court rendered a final judgment of conviction on the grounds that all appeals filed by the Defendants were dismissed, and that the conviction was affirmed. The 5th judgment was rendered as follows. While the 5th judgment was appealed by the 16th judgment, the appeal was dismissed on September 13, 2018 (Ulsan High Court 2017Na56349, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

5th 17th 17th - "in the first instance of related civil procedure, the judgment of the first instance of related civil procedure which has become final and conclusive" shall be applied.

6.On the basis of the recognition of the 6th 1st eth eth eth 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.

11. Two to seven parallels shall be cut down as follows:

① As seen earlier, from the first instance court to March 30, 2017, the Defendants’ occupational negligence and injury.

arrow