Defendant

B, J, and K shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are those who have obtained permission for Gyeongnam-do coastal fishing business.

In April 4, 2007, the Korea Rural Community Corporation and the Korea Rural Community Corporation entered into a contract for the investigation of fishery damage with the Seoul National Institute of Marine Research and Fisheries around April 2009, in accordance with the compensation plan for fishery damage in accordance with the Mine dredging Project and the Act on the Construction of General Seahead of the Korea, which was implemented by the Korea Coast Guard in the area of the leisure of the victims to the area of the sea, from 2002 to 2013, and entered into a contract for the investigation of fishery damage with the Korea Rural Community Corporation around April 2009.

In relation to the above compensation, the areas and sea areas subject to fishery damage are the areas where the damage was incurred due to the dredging construction of the ocean-going route in the vicinity of the mining damage port, the area adjacent to the ocean-going water, the area in which the damage was caused by the dredging construction of the ocean-going areas. The subject of compensation is the area where the fishery right (license, permit, report) is valid after obtaining a fishery permit from the competent Si/Gun under the Fisheries Act in the area of the mining area, the leisure city, the South Sea-gun, and the Hadong-gun, and the area under which the fishery damage occurred between 202 and 2004 (based on the investigation of the actual results of fishery business), which is the criteria date for compensation of the damage caused by the dredging of the sea route, and the fishing vessel subject to compensation has already been acquired before the compensation base date and acquired the fishery right subject to compensation after the compensation base date and succeeded to the right.

Therefore, fishery damage is not the subject of compensation unless the fishery damage is the fishery right.

Nevertheless,

1. On December 201, 201, Defendant A: (a) at the 24 Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong, the fact is that the fishery was operated in the coast of fishery damage or was damaged by fishery; and (b) at the personnel in charge of compensation for the victims, such as the Korea Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha