logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.10.28 2014나14861
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' claims expanded and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Relevant Defendants of the parties have the intent to jointly operate the J Hospital located in Seoan-gu I (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Plaintiff B is the mother mother, the Plaintiff A, the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C, the husband of the Plaintiff, on January 15, 2012.

B. 1) On June 6, 1998, Plaintiff B was 38 years of age (as of January 2012, 201) who had the first step due to the king operation due to the imbalance between Abruals and B on June 6, 1998, and the natural part of the king after the king (VBAC, Vainal birth birth brrec, hereinafter referred to as “bag”).

) From November 4, 2011, which was the 28th parking day of pregnancy, the Defendant hospital had undergone a medical examination at the Defendant hospital. There was no special case between the Defendant and the fetus before delivery. (ii) The Plaintiff B sleeped sleep on January 14, 2012, which was pregnant 38 parking days, and applied to the Defendant hospital.

The defendant hospital confirmed, through earthquake-proof, that the outline of the plaintiff B's self-spawn landscape and the degree of the self-spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn swn swn swn swn swn

On January 14, 2012, the Defendant Hospital conducted a non-water axis test (NST and Non-Stres) against Plaintiff B on January 14, 2012, and confirmed that the fetus heart stuff (FHR, Fetal HE) was 142 multiple times per minute.

3) Around 15:00 on January 14, 2012, the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) directed Plaintiff B to only a natural portion by administering the penttoto. However, the Plaintiff hospital did not have a sufficient studio, and it did not completely open the chronological landscape that should be conducted for delivery. Accordingly, on January 14, 2012, the Defendant hospital suspended the chrontopy around 19:00 on January 15, 2012, and decided to again attempt only an inducement from around 06:00 on January 15, 2012 until the chrontototopy was opened, and then the Defendant hospital decided to again promote the chrontopy from around 06:00 on January 15, 2012 to around 06:30 on January 15, 2012, on January 15, 2012.

arrow