1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff B and C are the parents of the plaintiff, and the defendant is a doctor who treated the plaintiff A as the president of the hospital.

B. On August 18, 2015, Plaintiff A visited the Defendant’s hospital on the left-hand lux, the left-hand lux, and the left-hand lux. After conducting CT and MRI’s inspection, the Defendant: (a) determined that Plaintiff A’s 4-5 metrecept pressured and complained of pain; and (b) concluded August 20, 2015, Plaintiff A’s laminomy performed an operation of cutting down with a luxous lux by removing the human seal in the vicinity of the luxical lux and removing the luxom by using the luxic lux on the luxic lux on August 2015; and (c) carried out an operation of cutting off the luxic luxic lux and the luxic luxic luxic luxic lux by spreading the space outside the lux and luxic luxic lux.

C. On August 21, 2015, Plaintiff A removed urines inserted into the urine, and complained of difficulties in urine emissions around August 26, 2015, which was six days after the surgery. Accordingly, the Defendant discharged urines with a carter and added urines again.

Plaintiff

On August 28, 2015, A hospitalized in F Hospital because it has difficulty in urology, and received the diagnosis of “malinary breathy disorder” due to the difficulty in urine urine urine, and when the normal urine urine urine urine urine urine is temporarily or permanently damaged by urine urine urine urine urine in which the urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine in which the urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine is located. The urine urine urine urine urine urine is removed

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant caused damage to the plaintiff by failing to perform his/her duty of care while performing the narrowness operation of the plaintiff A's memorial signboard, resulting in urine impairment to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's damage caused by the above medical negligence is compensated for.