logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.08.28 2013가단369
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. On October 3, 2010, Plaintiff A asserted that he/she did not go to the emergency room of Defendant Hospital because he/she did not have good conditions, such as heating to his/her own body.

Until now, even though the plaintiff A received treatment due to crymosis, the plaintiff A did not have received crymmatization procedures.

Nevertheless, the nurses and medical doctors of the defendant hospital did not confirm the status of the plaintiff A properly, and did so more than 10 times without confirming the condition of the plaintiff A, so that the plaintiff et al. was forced to perform the cathericization procedure.

For this reason, the plaintiff A has become aware of the need for development and has lost the sexual function due to the aftermatho.

The defendant who is the nurse and the user of the nurse who erred in the Docterization procedure, and the plaintiff A claimed payment of KRW 104,798,865 (i.e., the lost income calculated according to the rate of 15% based on the income of the urban employee (i.e., the lost income of KRW 48,017,295, 1,781,570 for future treatment expenses of KRW 30,000 for future treatment expenses of KRW 30,000 for consolation money of KRW 25,00,000 for delay), and the plaintiff B, the wife of the plaintiff A, sought payment of KRW 5,00,000 for consolation money of KRW 1,570 for each delay.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff A was diagnosed as an acute cirrosis in another hospital and received treatment at the outside of the Defendant hospital. From August 11, 2010 to September 27, 2010, the Plaintiff received the first cirral cancer treatment from the blood species department and received the second cirral cancer treatment from September 24, 2010 to September 27, 2010.

However, on October 3, 2010, Plaintiff A applied to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital on the ground that there was symptoms such as high heat, etc. from the preceding day before the date, Plaintiff A applied to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. At the time of the visit, Plaintiff A’s body temperature was 39.2x, blood pressure was 103/49mHg, and blood pressure was 103/39mHg. Since the body temperature continued to be 38-39x, blood pressure was reduced to 69/54mHg, and beebage increased to 122 times/mination, and the number of leti other than letith was much higher than normal water pressure.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital diagnosed the condition of the plaintiff A in a state of urgency or hemopic shock shock, which inevitably occurs after the hambathy, and the plaintiff A's life.

arrow