beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 29, 2012, the Defendant appealed from the Suwon District Court after having been sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud, fabrication of public documents, etc., and was sentenced to imprisonment on April 18, 2013 by the same court for the same year.
5. 20. The above judgment was finalized.
1. The Defendant, a credit bad credit holder of class 9 of credit rating, had been in arrears with 150 million construction costs in relation to the multi-household E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant had been in arrears with 100 million construction costs. The Defendant had no property value in the state of being offered as security for a separate debt even in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the husband of F, and 2-dong 301, the former H Housing No. 302, which was owned by the Defendant. On December 2, 2010, the Defendant: (a) newly constructed a house to I and sold the house to others; and (b) had no intention or ability to pay the price within 15 days, even if the Defendant had been supplied with the said debt because it was economically difficult due to the lack of payment of the debt; and (c) the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price to the victim within 15 days.
Nevertheless, around March 9, 2011, the Defendant, at the construction site located in the J of Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who is deemed to be a clerical error, concluded that “The Defendant would pay the price within 15 days from the delivery date of the iron at the time of supply” was issued by the victim about KRW 25,0350,000,000 in total from that time until April 23, 2011.
2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. On March 201, 201, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of L, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of L, a private document stating L’s name and address (Tongbuk-do M apartment 109-214) on the letter of delegation using a black pen on the printed proxy paper, in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant: (a) and forged a letter of delegation in the name of L, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of L, which is a private document.
(b).