A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Suwon Friwon on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On January 10, 2017, the Seoul East District Court issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

Criminal facts

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol content of about 700 meters from the roads near Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si to the roads in front of the same Si’s revised air vibration 4789 SMwa Holdings; (b) while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.127% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license, the Defendant driven a BKankn knb owned by a non-Japan Capital (ju).

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking, was driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and the statement in the circumstances of the driver;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (A), and Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the previous indictment and summary order);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment provided for in a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding the observation of protection and the order to attend a lecture are not stated in the records of the same kind of crime, and the defendant was charged with driving under drinking at the police station of the Busan Western District on March 14, 2017 immediately after the instant crime was committed.

The defendant recognized the suspicion of the above drinking driving in this court, and according to this, the defendant was found to have committed three-time crimes of drinking driving for four months.

Of the blood of this case, the degree of alcohol concentration.