1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to add the following to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance: (a) Gangwon Industrial Development brought an action against the Defendant seeking revocation of the first order to take measures by the Jeonju District Court 2014Guhap2659; (b) the Jeonju District Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on June 30, 2016; (c) the appellate court of Gwangju High Court 2016Nu1559, which is the appellate court of appeal, and Supreme Court 2017Du3423, which is the appellate court of final appeal, dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal and appeal and became final and conclusive April 28, 2017; (d) the fifth to the sixth to the sixth to the sixth to the sixth to the sixth to the sixth; and (e) the Minister of Environment may request the head of the competent agency or the Mayor/Do governor to verify whether to use the relevant information pursuant to Article 48(2) of the Wastes Control Act, as stated in the main sentence of Article 30 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Criminal record certification of family relation, which is the data prescribed to be used to verify the appropriateness of the above provisions, is not related to the documents that should be attached to the report on succession to rights and obligations under Article 47 of the Enforcement Rule of the Wastes Control Act, to the matters contained in attached Form 35 or the documents that should be attached to the report on succession to rights and obligations. On the other hand, the confirmation of the grounds for disqualification for the license of the

As seen earlier, business takeover under Article 33(3) of the Wastes Control Act is required.