1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 3 million against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff), the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) from May 21, 2012 to August 21, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a doctor who operates the Plaintiff’s family relationship C Council member (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Council member”), and the Defendant is a patient who has received co-malopic surgery from the Plaintiff.

B. (1) Around April 2007, the Defendant received a co-malopic surgery from another sexual surgery, and received a re-operation one year after the end of the co-malop, but the Plaintiff Council member was removed from the malopic, and visited the malopic with the remainder of the co-malopic.

(2) On January 3, 2011, after consultation with the Defendant on January 27, 2011, the Plaintiff carried out a co-marction on the following occasions: (a) inserting a protein and a protein in the end of the Defendant’s coin; and (b) inserting a protein into a protein and a protein with a protein at a distance of 1m after cutting off a person subject to a brush; and (c) inserting a protein into the coin.

(3) From the surgery to treat antibiotics, the Plaintiff removed brupted rice on February 5, 201, and observed on February 17, 2011, the Defendant complained of brushes. On August 5, 2011, the Plaintiff confirmed the Defendant’s end of crushes and observed the progress of September 10, 201, and removed crushes from the Defendant’s cocon on September 20, 201.

On May 21, 2012, the Defendant appealed for salt certificates, but confirmed that there was no difference in the examination, and instructed antibiotic medication.

(4) From May 10, 2012 to June 8, 2012, the Defendant took medicine by obtaining antibiotics and chlorates from other hospitals (intestines), and obtained a prescription for chlorates. On July 13, 2012, at a university hospital, the Defendant was given a view that the hump was caused by artificial insertings and the operation of hume is necessary, and received an operation to remove the humcons (mefines) and the humcons treatment on August 8, 2012 from another hospital (marology).

(5) At present, the Defendant’s co-shaped was changed.

(c) Relevant medical knowledge (1) Memera is an artificial insertion widely used to correct the deficit or transformation of the tissues in the operation of a congenital malutical surgery on the face of the inner part;

The mers shall be free from the time of inserting or infection, because it is possible to increase the fiber bloodline with a multi-official structure.