beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around August 2008, the Defendant: (a) held another person’s credit card serial number and effective term information issued abroad from Ma-gu, U.K. C; (b) purchased goods with an authorized certificate; (c) however, the domestic credit card can purchase goods only with a serial number and effective term; and (d) conspired with Ma-gu and conspired with Ma to purchase goods from the Internet shopping mall by taking advantage of the above foreign credit card information to order goods from the Internet shopping mall by taking advantage of the above foreign credit card information.
1. On January 20, 2009, at around 03:24, the Defendant conspired with D, by using the Internet at the Defendant’s home located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, to access the victim’s DNA shopping mall (NH). Following the entry of “the orderer F, mobile phone number G, delivery place address Seocho-gu Seoul E 501,” and the entry of the overseas credit card number number “H” and the validity term known as above, thereby deceiving the victim as if the Defendant was a legitimate holder of the said credit card.
However, in fact, since the above credit card information was arbitrarily collected from C, the defendant and D did not have the right to use it.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D, received the digital camera equivalent to KRW 1,918,050 of the above temporary border price from the victim, and received the goods equivalent to KRW 5,291,103 of the market price from the shopping mall in total of 54 times from January 6, 2009 to April 24, 2009, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.
2. The Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, in collusion with D, made a transaction by credit cards using credit cards using overseas serial numbers and effective information of the bearers sent by C, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1.
As a result, the Defendant conspired with D in collusion, from January 6, 2009 to January 2009.