Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case showed that the Defendant, at around 15:20 on May 2, 2012, driving a motor vehicle with blood alcohol concentration of 0.058% by driving a motor vehicle with Lone Star under the influence of blood alcohol concentration of 0.058%, led to the change of the 280km point of the coast Highway upstream from the Seoul direction to the three-lane from the Seoul direction by the negligence that led directly to the accident site in which the two-lanes of the coast Highway located in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, and the two-lanes of the 3-lane to the 3-lane of the 3-lane of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the influence of the driver under the direction of the vehicle under the influence of the D (70-year and south) driving of the vehicle under the influence of the 3-lane driver under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle.
The Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, who was driving a damaged vehicle due to shock, such as a cryposis, etc., from an influence in the treatment days, from an influent injury to the victim F (F) who was on board the damaged vehicle due to cryposis, etc., from an influence in the treatment days due to cryposis, etc., from an influent injury to the victim G (37 years of age and South), from an influence in the treatment days due to cryp, etc., from an influent injury to the same victim H (25 years of age and influence
2. The judgment of the defendant, at around 15:20 on May 2, 2012, as evidence that the defendant, without a driver's license at around 15:20 on May 2, 2012, driven the damaged vehicle, as well as the Cone Starex Corresponding vehicle (hereinafter "the instant vehicle") in the state of blood alcohol concentration of 0.058%, there are witness G who driven the damaged vehicle and witness G, witness G, witness F, his wife, and documents related to drinking control on the defendant prepared based on their statements made by the police, but the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the records are acknowledged by the record, i.e., the defendant was not driving the instant vehicle at the time of the instant accident from the investigative agency to the present court, but the defendant was driving by I, while the defendant was able to sleep on the chief steering, while driving the vehicle.