logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고정4068
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a taxi for the purpose of small-scale business in C.

On September 3, 2015, around 00:30 minutes in Seoul, the Defendant driven the said car from the 280 Saero Sari Sari Station, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and led the Defendant to continue to appear in the direction of the Saero Sari Road again in the direction of the Sari Road in the direction of the Sari Road.

Since the place is where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by making an internship at the place where the internship is permitted.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the center line to stop rapidly in order to avoid the collision of the victims D(61 years old)' E-Naypon's car operating in the direction of e-mail, which was passing through the intersection in the direction of e-mail, the opposite direction by the U.S., the Defendant's negligence.

In this way, the Defendant, through the above occupational negligence, suffered approximately three weeks from the victim F (29 years of age and women) who was on board the damaged vehicle, such as catum cats and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident described in D or F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographss of an accident vehicle and a black fluor video image;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (D, F) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow