1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On June 30, 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that, upon the Defendant’s father C of the Defendant’s father, the Plaintiff lent KRW 30 million to the Defendant with a promise to repay the amount immediately upon receipt of a request from the Defendant, “I need to operate the liquor agency,” and sought a loan of KRW 30 million to the Defendant and damages for delay.

The fact that the defendant was C's son, and the fact that the plaintiff remitted 30 million won to the defendant's account on June 30, 2009 is no dispute between the parties.

Meanwhile, in full view of the written evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the fact that C’s son, the Defendant’s punishment, operated a liquor distributor E, a corporation, and the fact that C prepared and issued a receipt that C received KRW 30 million to the Defendant on July 1, 2009. In light of such circumstances, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff lent KRW 30 million to the Defendant solely on the basis of the absence of such dispute, and there is no other evidence to prove that the Plaintiff lent KRW 30 million to the Defendant.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed for lack of reason.