1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff lent KRW 33 million to the Defendant during 2008, while setting the due date on June 30, 2009 (the Plaintiff’s request from the Defendant on January 9, 2018 to lend KRW 30 million to the Defendant on May 9, 2007, and that the Plaintiff lent KRW 30 million to the Defendant via C around June 5, 2007). The Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a promissory note with the evidence of the above loan, with a face value of KRW 33 million with an endorsement contract and a certificate of personal seal impression.

(2) In the above legal brief, the plaintiff asserted that the defendant delivered the above promissory note, etc. to the plaintiff around September 2009 as evidence of the above loan. 2. According to the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written appraisal of the written statement of the loan (Evidence A) submitted by the plaintiff, it is true that the written statement of the borrower column stated in the written evidence (Evidence A) submitted by the plaintiff is not written by the defendant. Thus, the above evidence No. 1 cannot be used as evidence because it cannot be recognized as the authenticity, and it is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff lent KRW 33 million to

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.