1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for this case is as follows, except for the addition or modification as follows, the court cites this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Section 2 of the first instance judgment and Section 15 of the title "....."

“As seen below, the Plaintiff added that “The CRPS was recognized in the area of rehabilitation in the area of the department of rehabilitation at the time of the reexamination, but was not determined as a disability rating on the ground that it did not meet the standards, but was determined as a disability in the area of not less than 7th class 401.”

The 2nd 16th 16th 2th 2th 16th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 200.

The following three pages 4 of the same three categories are "illegal: (a) if the disability rating of the Plaintiff's CRPS is judged to be Grade 6, it shall be combined with the determination of Class 7 and class 401 in the area of the outdoor space and the Plaintiff's disability rating shall be determined to Grade 6)."

“A” in the front part of the same five pages shall be changed to “A”.

The following shall be added to the 7 pages of the same 5 pages:

o 2011. 3. 29. 실시한 재심 신체검사에서는 Ｘ-ray 소견 - 골 감소증, 근전도 소견 - 정상, 3상 bone scan - 정상 범위, 시린감 호소, 부종이나 손톱 변화 없음, 근 위축 없음, 이질통 호소, 관절 운동범위 측정 못함. CRPS로 7급 401호 정도가 타당했을 수 있음 같은 6면 “인정 근거”란에 있는 각 “이 법원”을 각 “제1심법원”으로 변경한다.

From the second parallel to the first parallel of eight pages above the same six pages, the first parallel shall be changed as follows:

2. In full view of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff’s CCR falls under class 6(2)44 at the time of the instant disposition, comprehensively taking into account the aforementioned facts, the evidence, and the fact-finding reply to the Chief of the Seoul National University University Hospital, and the purport of the entire pleadings.