logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.10.25 2018가단57782
손해배상(산)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a medical corporation that establishes and operates a F Hospital in Yangsan City E.

Plaintiff

A entered the above hospital on September 1, 200 ("G hospital prior to the merger") and performed duties such as computer and planning and public relations, and was promoted as the head of the planning and public relations team team on February 201, and around February 1, 201, by the head of the general affairs division on February 1, 201.

Plaintiff

B and C are the wife and children of Plaintiff A.

B. At around 14:20 on April 22, 2011, Plaintiff A, including the occurrence of the instant accident of Plaintiff A, found that Plaintiff A had a management director and a secretary-general who was in the meeting at the office of Secretary-General of the above hospital, and whether the personnel proposal was well-grounded. Around 14:20, Plaintiff A and the Secretary-General appeared on the floor of the ceiling while referring to “a language” in the Do in which the management director and the Secretary-General considered the draft proposal.

Since then, it is confirmed that cerebrovascular was being carried out as a result of the transfer to the emergency room of the above hospital and the CT photography was conducted, and it was sent back to the neighboring massic acid Hospital and received two dyspical and dyspical dyspology removal.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

At the time of the instant accident, Plaintiff A’s work type 1) was promoted by the chief of the general affairs division on February 1, 2011, and the general affairs team, management team, information support team, and planning and promotion team were overall control over Plaintiff A. 2) From February 26, 2011 to February 26, 2011, immediately after the promotion was issued, Plaintiff A took overall control of inventory inspection work, such as pharmaceutical products, medical instruments, medical equipment, and medical expendable items, within the said hospital.

In addition, at the beginning of April 2011, the method of approval within the hospital was changed to the structure that requires the cooperation or consultation of the head of the administrative office or the head of the hospital, after obtaining the final approval from the president through the former head of the hospital or the head of the administrative office.

Therefore, in the column for confirmation of approval of the internal document of the above hospital, the head of the hospital and the head of the administrative office have the intention to approve, but the head of the hospital and the head of the administrative office have often refused to approve on the ground that they were excluded from the affairs.

arrow