1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 250,000,000 and the interest rate thereon from December 17, 2014 to the date of full payment.

1. If Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 showed the purport of the whole pleadings as to the assertion of the cause of the claim, the plaintiff extended KRW 200,000,000 on August 12, 2002, and KRW 200,000,000 on September 17, 2002, and KRW 100,000 on August 11, 2003 to the defendant Eul, and additionally lent KRW 30,000,000 after adding each of the above money, and then additionally lent KRW 30,000,000 on August 11, 200.

) On October 31, 2005, KRW 100,000, KRW 100,000, KRW 1000,000 on December 30, 2005, and KRW 50,000 on December 31, 2007, additional KRW 30,000 after being paid for each of them, and Defendant B received reimbursement on March 31, 2008, KRW 250,000 on the loan amount of KRW 250,000 on the loan amount of KRW 10,000 on March 31, 208, KRW 200 on the loan amount of KRW 20,000 on the loan amount of KRW 100,000 on the loan amount of KRW 200,000 on the loan amount of KRW 100,000 on the loan amount of KRW 300,000 on the loan amount of KRW 3000,000 on the loan amount of KRW

(1) Defendant C’s wife signed the loan certificate of this case as a guarantor. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants jointly and severally (Defendant C signed the loan certificate of this case as a mere guarantor, but did not clearly dispute the Plaintiff’s assertion that he/she is jointly and severally liable to pay, and thus, the Defendants’ joint and several payment obligations should be recognized.

The Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 250,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

2. The Defendants’ assertion as to the Defendants asserted that Defendant B borrowed the above money from Defendant B’s husband and the Plaintiff’s denying D, and that there was no money borrowed from the Plaintiff. However, in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the entries in Articles 2 and 3, the following circumstances, namely, most of the borrowed money that Defendant B received, was transferred to Defendant B’s deposit account in the Plaintiff’s name, and the cashier’s check paid by Defendant B as a repayment of borrowed money was deposited into the Plaintiff’s deposit account, and the Defendant B also deposited part of the borrowed money into the Plaintiff’s deposit account.