beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months and fine of three million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of six months.
Defendant
A above.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A is a business owner who operates a commercial sex dealing business with the trade name of Gangnam-gu C Officetel D and E leased, and Defendant B is a person who solicits male customers to engage in commercial sex dealing business in the first hill station.
1. No one shall arrange, induce, induce, or compel an unspecified person to engage in sexual intercourse or any other similar sexual intercourse in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits from such an unspecified person;
Nevertheless, the Defendants were from June 20, 2019 to the same year.
7. From September 2, 200 to September 2, 200, advertisements were made to “G” on the Internet site, and reported and contacted to “F”, or provided guidance to the above officetels room by receiving 100,000 won from the customers who provided an entertainment in the street and who provided an entertainment in the street and received 180,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts, and employed in advance sexual intercourses with “H, I, or similar sexual intercourses.”
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, operates an officetel sexual traffic business with the trade name “F”,
A. A. Around June 20, 2019, entry into the Republic of Korea as a refugee application (G-1) capacity and employment was made on the condition that KRW 50,000 to KRW 120,00,000 out of the sexual purchase price paid by customers who have no employment status; and
B. Around July 6, 2019, entry into the status of refugee application (G-1) and employment was made on condition that KRW 50,000 to KRW 120,000,000, out of the gender purchase price paid by customers who do not have employment status.
Accordingly, the Defendant employed a foreigner who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.
Summary of Evidence
[Fact 1]
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against H and I