A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 10, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties: (a) around 23:07, the Defendant: (b) driven a Kani-si, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, the Central Baba-dong 14 on the 25-day Doo-dong, while drinking alcohol; (c) driven a Kani-ray vehicle parked at the 25-day Doo-dong; (d) driven a Kani-si; and (e) driven a 10-meter more while

The causes of accidents, such as shocking of the known vehicle, and the situation E, etc. of the Yangcheon Police Station called upon the report of 112 by the witness, was suspected of driving drinking, such as smelling the Defendant, and led the Defendant to the Yangcheon Police Station (No. 22) after arresting the flagrant offender, which led the Defendant to the patrol vehicle (No. 22).

On March 10, 2018, the Defendant, while getting on and getting on a patrol vehicle as seen above, assaulted F with the driver’s f, who was under the influence of alcohol from the back seat, to the back seat, with the defect that F, who was aboard the steering f on the steering f, transferred F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

2. On March 11, 2018, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol to the Defendant from a slope H belonging to Yangcheon Police Station G G at Yangcheon Police Station G located in Yangcheon-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, about 0:25, while driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol to the Defendant from a slope H belonging to the Yangcheon Police Station G, and raising red on the face.

Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand for responding to the measurement of drinking in a manner that puts the breag into a drinking measuring instrument over about 26 minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided drinking so that he did not comply with a police officer's request for drinking alcohol measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) and a actual survey report;

1. A certificate of the measurement of drinking alcohol, a statement in the circumstances of the driver concerned, and a report on the detection of the driver concerned;