logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.13 2015고단370
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:50 on December 10, 2014, the Defendant refused to take a drinking test in order to verify whether E, etc. was drinking or not, upon receiving a report on a drinking-related vehicle in front of the wife population Kim Fran-dong 254-131, and called the above E, who attempted to flee at several times, and refrain from doing so. The Defendant expressed the above E, “I am special, I am special,? I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am am special, I am special, and we am am am special, I am am special, we am am under the influence of drinking driving.

2. Defendant B

A. A. On December 10, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) driving at a 3km section of workplace A from the Song-ri to the upper end of the 254-131 Gambon-dong Kim Jong-dong, Young-si, the Defendant, around 00:0 on December 10, 2014, driven at around 3km from the Song-ri to the upper end of the 254-131 Gambon-dong, Kim Jong-dong, and there are reasonable grounds to recognize the Defendant that he was under the influence of alcohol, such as snicking, snicking, and snicking, while he requested for a drinking measurement for three times, such as around 01:46, around 201:56, around 302:06, the Defendant failed to comply with the demand without justifiable grounds.

B. At around 00:50 on December 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the control of a crime committed by a police officer, by putting his/her grandchildren, who was called up after receiving a report in front of the 254-131 Gamboo-dong, Gambol-dong 254-131, and thereby preventing the police officer from attempting to arrest a flagrant offender A; and (b) putting his/her grandchildren

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the status of drivers (B);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow