logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.06.16 2013고단4117
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall pay 170,000 won to C who is an applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that he/she sold Nos. 417 to the victim D of the Nos. Spain on Internet NAVanda Pene on March 24, 2013.

However, even if money is remitted, there was no intention or ability to sell the bank.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 51,00 from the victim’s account under the name of the National Bank E account on March 24, 2013, and received KRW 51,000 from the victim. From the above date to November 1, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 1,916,000 in total on 12 occasions as shown in the crime list as shown in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, received money from each victim by deceiving each victim and deceiving him.

[2013 Highest 4513] On October 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) linked to Internet Ntp Kabro-Ba (htp:/caf.naver.com/joint venture/joint venture) at a place where the location cannot be known; (b) deemed that the Defendant would send 100,000 won to the Defendant for delivery of the said goods upon contact with the victim.

However, the defendant did not possess such things, and there was no intention or ability to sell them.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 100,000 from the victim to the new bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

"2013 Highest 4541"

1. On September 30, 2013, at a place where it is difficult to identify the place, the Defendant posted a letter to purchase the “Ti-do Game”, which was posted by the victim H, by accessing the Internet Neneber Catna, at a place where it is difficult to identify, and provided that the Defendant would contact the victim with the victim, and would send the said goods as a door-to-door dispatch if the remittance was made.

However, the defendant did not possess such things, and there was no intention or ability to sell them.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is above.

arrow