logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.17 2013가단230206
손해배상(자)
Text

1. With regard to the accident described in the attached Table 1, the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay insurance money to the Defendant is KRW 8,326,755.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 11, 2012, B driven a C Passenger (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 18:30 on July 11, 2012, while proceeding in the direction of the Bririridong located in the Soririridong located in Busan Metropolitan City, the front part of the taxi where it is impossible to identify the signaler’s number due to the negligence that failed to perform the obligation of securing the safety distance with the vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the Defendant aboard the rear seat of the said taxi suffered injury, such as the bones, tension, etc. of the bones, due to the instant accident.

B. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff vehicle.

[Recognizing Facts] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the fact of recognition as above, the Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and is liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages caused by the instant accident.

3. The period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than won shall be discarded, and the current value calculation at the time of the accident of damages shall be in accordance with the simple interest rate which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and it shall be deemed to have been rejected that which is not written among the parties' arguments; and

A. Personal information 1) Personal information: Dirst male, 56 years old and 7 days old at the time of the instant accident: Occupation and monthly income: The Plaintiff appears to have been able to obtain income equivalent to the daily wage while working as an urban ordinary father by the age of 60, while working as an urban ordinary father by the age of 60, and thus, the daily income is to be calculated based on the monthly average wage multiplied by 22 days in operation days.

3) According to the results of the physical appraisal commission and fact-finding inquiry with respect to the director of an authorized university affiliated with the authorized university.

arrow