A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 19:30 on May 29, 2013 to 20:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business, on the ground that from the “Fn of the operation of the victim D and the victim E”, the Defendant was unable to properly accommodation the above guests by leaving the above visit from the victim E to close the 3rd door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door from the victim E on 2 to 3 occasions, and continuously breaking the hallway door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door from the above visit door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

2. In the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, the injured Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s face at a time and place; (b) took the victim’s face from a horse to the victim’s face; (c) took the victim’s hair back by hand; (d) took the victim’s head scam; (c) laid the victim’s right part by hand; (d) putting the victim’s head scam over the victim’s right part; and (e) embling the victim’s head e (e.g., 70 years of age); and (e) putting the victim’s scam over the bottom, which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment; and (e) brain scam in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) of the obstruction of performance of official duties, expressed that “I wish to listen to the Defendant’s statement by the staff of the Daegu Western Police Station G District G District, which was called by the Defendant after receiving a report that the Defendant 112 was fluoring the Defendant’s fluor, and assaulted the Defendant, such as fluoring h’s face at one time, fluoring the Defendant’s body, fluoring h’s arms, and fluoring the Defendant’s body.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, D, and E;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.