logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.17 2016고단3244
먹는물관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and two months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of two years and six months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of one year, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 201, 302, and 402 is the head of G Co., Ltd. who is the water quality inspection institution of drinking water in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and exercises overall control over the analysis of water quality samples.

On January 2, 2015, the Defendant, at the above company analysis team office, issued a false test report on January 13, 2015 using the following: (a) although S did not inspect an organic item while conducting the water quality inspection of samples for which the request for regular inspection of groundwater quality was made; (b) as a result of normal testing, as if the organic item was not detected; (c) A, a water quality inspection program for rap, entered a false test report into the column for the organic item of rap, and issued a false test report on January 13, 2015.

On January 13, 2015, from around May 11, 2016 to around May 11, 2016, the Defendant intentionally issued 3,303 items of the inspection result when conducting an inspection under the Water Quality Control Act at an inspection institution designated by the Minister of Environment as a drinking water quality inspection institution, such as the list of offenses (1).

"2016 Highest 3446"

1. Defendant D, Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C’s violation of the Water Management Act represent G Co., Ltd., a food-designated inspection company located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. Defendant B is the regular director of the said company with Defendant D’s children. Defendant A is the head of the said company’s analysis office with Defendant D’s wife, and Defendant C is a public official in charge of water quality management and inspection of water supply and sewerage systems belonging to the Gangwon-do Telecommunication.

Defendant

C around June 2014, at the request of Defendant B to conduct various water quality testing on water supply facilities in the Gangwon-do T-do T-Water Treatment Business, which are managed by the Gangwon-do T-do T-Water Treatment and Waterworks Business Office, he is required to collect an amount of about 30% of the inspection cost per case of the inspection requested by Defendant B, and has his own denial or person employed as a human resources of the company.

arrow