Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On March 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for a violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act in Busan District Court's branch branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 21, 2013.

1. The Defendant, along with B and N, conspiredd to intentionally cause a traffic accident with B and N, and to receive insurance money from an insurance company and obtain it by pretending to be injured due to the traffic accident.

On December 8, 2009, around 17:45, 2009, in the vicinity of the luminous Tri-gu 2-dong, Busan, the roads near the luminous Tri-gu, and N in the operation of the MP5-car, while operating the MP, the behind the B's operation, and the Defendant intentionally received the part behind the B's vehicle. In this case, the Defendant was on the B's operation, and was on the B's operation.

As above, the above traffic accident is not only an accident caused intentionally but also the defendant, N, and B did not suffer an injury. As such, the accident was received from the victim Matz Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. as if they suffered an injury due to negligence due to the above time, place, and the accident was received from the victim's employees, which was received total of KRW 3,704,90 from the victim as the medical expenses and agreement amount of the defendant and B, vehicle repair expenses, etc.

2. The Defendant conspiredd with B, C,W, and X to receive insurance money by falsely accepting an accident from the victim ELI Co., Ltd. and by receiving insurance money from the hospital, as the traffic accident had not occurred, even though there was no traffic accident, as the Defendant did not cause a traffic accident.

On October 28, 2010, 22:202:25, the Busan bank located in the Seosan-dong of Busan Metropolitan City, and the fact is that C operates a Ugp motor vehicle even though there is no traffic accident, and C operates a Ugp motor vehicle, while the Defendant, B, W, X was on board, the VfpG motor vehicle.