1. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable:

A. From September 11, 2015, Plaintiff 15,607,380 won and its related thereto to Plaintiff MBF households.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: B (C) and (7) - Public notice of project implementation authorization: The Gyeonggi-do public notice D ( April 8, 2013), Gyeonggi-do public notice E ( September 10, 2013), Gyeonggi-do public notice F ( June 5, 2014), Gyeonggi-do public notice G ( July 17, 2014), Gyeonggi-do public notice H ( April 21, 2015) - Project implementer: Defendants;

B. The Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal’s ruling of acceptance (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant adjudication”) dated July 27, 2015 and August 31, 2015 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the date of expropriation”) - The date of expropriation: October 10, 2015 (6j), October 15 (7j), 2015 (6j) - The obstacles in the attached Table 1 (6j) and each land (7j) (hereinafter referred to as “instant obstacles,” and “instant land”) - The amount of compensation indicated in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication of expropriation”): The Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal, as a result of appraisal, determined that the amount presented by the Defendants, the project implementer, is more than the amount computed by averaging the appraised values of the appraisers.

same as this section.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and a third appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser”)

C. The result of the appraisal commission of the appraiser I of this Court for the appraiser I of the corporation (affiliated appraisal corporation) - Contents of appraisal: The appraisal of the instant obstacles and land as indicated in the column for "court appraisal amount" in the attached Table 1 appraisal report (hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal report") [based on recognition] of the absence of dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply], the result of the court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser I of this Court, the fact inquiry of August 12, 2016, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The main point of the plaintiffs' assertion is as follows. The defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation and the amount of compensation for expropriation decision and delay damages to the plaintiffs.