Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2289]

1. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Sungnam-gu B and 5 floors, will enter the victim C with cash within the amount of “CCTV Kamera and household electric appliances installed.”

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price normally to the victim even if he purchased and installed CCTV camera and household appliances from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the said products by means of not paying the price even after purchasing CCTV and home appliances equivalent to the sum of KRW 1,360,000,000,000, including 32,000,000,000,000,00 won.

2. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Sung-nam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D and the third floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) around October 28, 2016, would receive the agreement on the case in which CCTV and household appliances are installed in the office, and would promptly pay the outstanding amount to the previous accounts.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price normally to the victim even if he purchased and installed CCTV camera and household appliances from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the said products by deceiving the victim by means of purchasing CCTV and home appliances in a sum of KRW 852,000,000 and KRW 47,000,00,000, including 30,000,000,000,000.

[2017 High 1043] On October 17, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E in the French coffee shop located in Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, that “I will pay the victim E in money, as the expenses, such as material cost, are required.”

However, in fact, the defendant was working in F as a day duty, and there was no need for the expenses such as material cost, etc., and received money.