beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B: 40,792,035 won;
B. 1 Defendant D jointly with Defendant B.
40,792,035.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur engaged in the wholesale business in the name of “G” in the name of “G” in the territory of Cheongju-si, a substantial area of Cheongju-si, and the name of “I” in “I”. 2) Defendant B served from February 2, 2001 to June 201, as the delivery staff of the above G and I from February 201 to June 201.
3) Defendant C and Defendant D were married couple, and they were personal entrepreneurs engaged in the sales business of each sentence, etc. with the trade name “K points” (the trade name before the amendment on December 4, 2013: L) in the Cheongju-si District Court’s Cheongju-si Cheong-si Cheong-si Cheong-si Cheong-si Cheong-si Ma, and the trade name “N” in the Cheongcheon-si Ma. B. As to the criminal facts described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) at the Cheongju District Court’s District Court on August 23, 2016, Defendant B and Defendant D were sentenced to the suspended sentence for 2 years in prison, Defendant D were sentenced to the suspended sentence for 3 months in prison, and Defendant E was sentenced to the suspended sentence for 1 year in April of imprisonment without prison labor (the Cheongju District Court Decision 2015Mo477, hereinafter “related criminal judgment”), and only the prosecutor appealed appealed the above judgment (hereinafter “related criminal judgment”).
1) From the beginning of July 2012 to the end of September 21, 2012, Defendant B: (a) stolen the phrases equivalent to KRW 256,130, which were kept in a warehouse using a cresh in which the Plaintiff’s surveillance was neglected; and (b) stolen the phrases and office supplies equivalent to KRW 40,792,035, the market price of the Plaintiff’s possession over 112 times from around that time to May 20, 2014; (c) Defendant D acquired the office supplies from Defendant B’s occupational negligence from January 2, 2014 to April 21, 2014; and (d) neglected to acquire the Plaintiff’s phrases and office supplies that he stolen from the Defendant B, and neglected to exercise due care to verify whether they were the stolen goods; and (d) neglected to obtain them on a total of KRW 1527,270,00,527,000.
3 Defendant E’s acquisition of occupational stolens by Defendant E is owned by the Plaintiff, which he stolen from Defendant B during the period from September 2012 to October 2012.