1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

However, the sentence against the defendant A for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A served as a delivery engineer of the “I” (SO wholesale store) operated by the victim H in substantial Gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

Using the fact that the injured person does not properly arrange for inventory of a warehouse, the Defendant was willing to steal the phrases, office supplies, etc. kept in the above Seodaemun-gu Center as if they were supplied normally.

Accordingly, the Defendant, from early July 2012 to around September 2012, 2012, transported the Defendant’s vehicle from Jone Starex to Jone Star Co., Ltd., which the Defendant driven, as if he/she transferred the Defendant’s vehicle to a customer by mixing the articles of clause 16 of the phrase, such as the market price of KRW 256,130, which is in storage in the warehouse with the articles of the normal delivery of KRW 16,130, by using the gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected.

In addition, from around that time to May 20, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen phrases, office supplies, etc. equivalent to KRW 40,792,035 won in total, as shown in Appendix I, from around 112 times in total, as shown in Appendix I.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in the purchase and sale of literature, detention, office supplies, etc. under the trade name of “L from K incheon-si.”

From early July 2012, the Defendant purchased 16 species 16, such as the Victim H, which he stolen from A, at the “N” restaurant parking lot located in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, M, at a lower level than the wholesale price.

In such a case, there was a duty of care to verify whether the goods were normally taken out to the person who operates the store, whether the delivery service provider A, who is not the operator, received the price of the goods in his/her account, and the reason why the tax invoice is not issued normally, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the judgment on the stolen water while neglecting his/her duty from September 2012 to October 2012.